Someone Would Have Talked The Assassination of President John F Kennedy and the Conspiracy to Mislead History by Larry Hancock – Too Serious Not To Be Taken Seriously
Posted in Amazons Hot Daily Deals on Sep 22nd, 2009
Someone Would Have Talked The Assassination of President John F Kennedy and the Conspiracy to Mislead History by Larry Hancock – Save 10% Today!
Why Buy A Someone Would Have Talked The Assassination of President John F Kennedy and the Conspiracy to Mislead History by Larry Hancock?
Someone Would Have Talked goes beyond proving a conspiracy to murder President Kennedy. Over 14.000 documents, White House diaries, telephone logs, and executive tape recordings detail how the new president, Lyndon B. Johnson, managed a cover-up that changed the future of our country. A second conspiracy designed to mislead the nation, the world, indeed, history. Someone Would Have Talked was written to demonstrate with available information, the cover-up, the leaks, Lee Oswald, Jack Ruby and the people that did talk, providing a cohesive and coherent explanation of events. And in doing so this book gives the reader an introduction to the history of the secret war against Castro and against Communism during the 1960s, an introduction that is vital to an appreciation of the individuals, and their motivations. Someone Would Have Talked deals with specific people who talked about their personal knowledge of a conspiracy in the murder of a President. These individuals include four men associated with the CIA s JM WAVE station in Miami Florida. Two of them were senior CIA officers, one a veteran of three years of Castro assassination projects and the other a three year prisoner of Castro – and an organizer and participant, along with a former U.S. Ambassador, in one of the most potentially explosive Cuban penetration missions ever conducted.
Over 29 Five Star Customer Reviews On Amazon!
Too serious not to be taken seriously
Emotions always run high when conspiracies are the topic of discussion. In today’s intellectual environment, where a priori conclusions are often “supported” by carefully screened facts, where value systems are “vindicated” by spin (and sometimes outright fabrication), where myth so easily assumes the stature of truth, it is rare to find an author who has the discipline and integrity to limit his or her presentation to what can only be supported by verifiable fact. It is particularly difficult to do this when one’s personal investigation leads overwhelmingly to a final conclusion which angrily demands presentation, yet the last step cannot be taken without abandoning the realm of verifiable fact and entering instead the realm of highly probable conjecture.Yet this is exactly what Mr. Hancock has achieved with his book “Someone Would Have Talked”. In one sense, reading the book leaves one very dissatisfied, because so many loose ends cannot be tied up – a complete, final and cathartic picture of the JFK assassination is not (and cannot be) presented. On the other hand, what IS presented is the most rock-solid investigation of the JFK assassination I have found to date. Mr. Hancock refuses to present the slightest detail he cannot prove, and what he does present leaves the Warren Commission and the idea of Lee Oswald as a lone shooter forever on the junk heap of history.
For example, my own readings compel me to believe that LBJ knew about the plot beforehand, and probably was in on the planning. I would not be surprised to learn that Mr. Hancock privately agrees with me. But the only aspect of LBJ’s involvement presented in his book is the cover-up after the fact. Why? Because the evidence for the cover-up is solid, while the evidence for complicity is not. That’s not to say that such evidence does not exist. But Mr. Hancock distinguishes between “evidence” and “proof”, something many conspiracy writers easily confuse.
This is serious research and scholarship, and probably not recommended for people who are just starting out on their (inevitably) long journey away from the cover-up fabricated by the government. The more one already knows about the events in question, the more compelling this book will be. Beginners are probably best advised to start elsewhere. But for those who are prepared to have the “official story” once and for all relegated to the realm of historical fiction, this is a “must read”.
GREAT WORK
Larry Hancock is a top tier researcher who has fashioned a work which will be around a long time.
His propensity for exacting detail reflects great credit on him and the JFK research community.Bob Dorff
Yes they would have
No doubt dozens of people would have loved the opportunity to talk about what they knew about the Kennedy assassination, unfortunately they had a strange habit of dying under suspicious circumstances. From the accused assassin himself, Lee Harvey Oswald, to Roger Craig of the Dallas Police, to any number of journalists and underworld/government agents, nobody was safe from the cover-up hit squads. It’s hard to talk when you’re dead.
Other Great Products From Amazon
On the Trail of the JFK Assassins: A Revealing Look at Americas Most Infamous Unsolved Crime
JFK: The Cuba Files: The Untold Story of the Plot to Kill Kennedy (Secret War)
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters
Ultimate Sacrifice: John and Robert Kennedy, the Plan for a Coup in Cuba, and the Murder of JFK
A Farewell to Justice: Jim Garrison, JFKs Assassination, and the Case That Should Have Changed History
